Boycott the Olympics? USA Today Weighs In On the Debate

April 8, 2008

USA Today has printed an interesting opinion piece today concerning the idea behind boycotting the Olympic Games in China this summer. As opinions go, they are often one-sided with a personal agenda–luckily USA Today has posted both sides to the debate.

The first opinion suggests that the United States shouldn’t Boycott the games, themselves, but leave the options open for an opening ceremony boycott–which a lot of countries at this point are starting to discuss. The reason being that a full onslaught boycott would discourage athletes in the United States and possibly hamper their only shot at achieving greatness on such a large stage.

The same article goes on to suggest that if a decision is made to soon regarding a boycott, that this could possibly hamper any kind of influence that western society could have in the next four months–good point.

The Second Opinion centers around the idea that it is wrong for the United States to show support towards a fascist regime. They bring up that China was turned down for an Olympic Bid in 2004 because of human rights issues, but vowed to improve in these areas for 2008. According to Amnesty International, China is responsible for 80% of all executions in the world. They also hold thousands of political prisoners with no hope for trial–in 2008.

“The Olympic torch is supposed to be a beacon of light shining upon
mankind’s higher aspirations, and it is a travesty to have it hosted by
the world’s worst human rights abuser.

To participate in these Games and stand idly by in the face of such
atrocities would be contradictory to our commitment to democracy
worldwide.

Once again, that is their opinion–What is yours?

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,