Snickers & Gulliver: From Jerry and Darla Merrow’s Side
May 2, 2008
I am writing on behalf of my sister and brother-in-law, Darla and Jerry Merrow, who after being shipwrecked on Fanning Island, had to leave behind their pets Snickers and Gulliver. The cocker spaniel dog and macaw bird have become quite famous after Jack Joslin graciously took the time and effort to adopt Snickers, saving him from being euthanized. Unfortunately, this story has painted a picture of Darla and Jerry that inaccurately portrays them to be irresponsible and uncaring towards their pets. I would like to respond to some of the remarks that have been made by both the authors of the many stories that have appeared on the internet and the bloggers who have commented on the stories.
The best way to clear up the misunderstandings is to start at the beginning of the story. Darla and Jerry have lived on a boat since they got married 10 yrs ago. After our family had a rough year in which 5 family members passed away, including both mom and dad, Darla and Jerry decided to take a break from work and go on an extended vacation. They took most of the money they had and outfitted their boat to standards needed to make a trip to Hawaii. (Please note that they NEVER iintended on taking their animals out of the country.) They left San Francisco late August 2007. Immediately, they hit a bad storm that seriously damaged their boat. They were able to turn around and dock at Moss Landing where they discovered that their boat was beyond repair. They purchased a different boat and again went through the process of getting it ready to sail. This ate up all of the money they had left.
Three weeks later, they set sail again. Darla told me it would be several weeks to a month before she would be able to make contact. Two months went by without word. Our family was worried sick, afraid that their boat had gone down and they were floating on a life raft in the middle of the ocean or worse. We weren’t that far off. I emailed the United States Coast Guard and asked for help locating their boat. The very next day I got a reply saying that someone in the office just happened to be reading an online sailing magazine, Latitude38. They remember reading a very short entry:
“On the morning of December 2, the 47-ft San Francisco-based motorsailer Darla Jean wrecked on the reef on the southeast side of Fanning Atoll in the Central Pacific.”
The story reported that all four of them were safe. The coast guard included a link to Robbie and Lorraine Coleman’s webpage. (they are an American couple who are currently staying on the island.) I emailed them and got more information about Darla and Jerry’s well-being. I continued to stay in touch with the Coleman’s until Darla and Jerry left Fanning for Christmas Island on the steamer “Nei Momi”.
When they left Moss Landing with their new boat, Darla and Jerry hit storm after storm and with each, their boat was damaged more and more. They ended up with no sail, no engine power and no ability to steer the boat. They left with a 6 month supply of food but most of it was ruined when a storm ripped open the storage area allowing salt water to mix with the food. They had to survive by spearing tuna that came near the boat. They were able to cook the fish until their propane ran out and than ate it raw. Once when Jerry was reeling in a tuna, the spear gun went overboard. They still had the spear, so they took a broom handle and fastened it to the spear. After this they had to wait until a fish was close enough to the boat and jab at it caveman style. There were times when they went without eating for 3-4 days. They drifted for over 100 days until one morning at 5:00 A.M. they slammed against the coral reef that surrounds Fanning Island.
In the pitch black they had to grab their important papers and jump ship praying that the coral would not tear them apart. Darla, Jerry, and Snickers all swam 200 meters to shore. Gulliver hitched a ride on Jerry’s shoulder. They made it to shore just as the sun was coming up. When it was light enough to see, Jerry swam back to the boat and started throwing packets of juice overboard. Darla gathered them up as they washed ashore. When they had everything they could carry they started walking to see if this island was inhabited. They came across a man on a motor scooter who waved and continued on his way. They were hoping that he was going to get help but a few minutes later they looked back at their boat and saw that man and several other people on their boat looting it. When they came into the village and found an island official, they were promptly arrested!! Darla had her passport with her, but Jerry’s fell out of his pocket during the swim to shore. He had no way of proving who he was and what he was doing on “their” island. Besides the Coleman’s there was only one person on the island who spoke very broken English.
Can you imagine trying to explain yourself in this situation?? From what I understand, the entire time on the island was spent “under arrest”. They stayed with the local police officer until they were able to board the steamer.
Here is where the first misconception occurs. Some articles do not clarify that Darla and Jerry did not choose to leave their pets on Fanning Island. The steamer Nei Momi would not allow the pets to board the ship. Darla and Jerry had to go to Christmas Island to get a new passport for Jerry and then they had to continue home to the United States. They had no choice!!
Darla and Jerry arrived on Christmas Island on Dec 24. They met some Mormon missionaries who took them in, shared their Christmas meal with them and paid for their flight to Hawaii. They are hero’s in this story who have not gotten fair thanks for their generosity!! Once on the flight to Hawaii, the pilot heard their story and took up a collection so that they could get a hotel room and another flight home. These people are also heros.
One blog that I read mentions that “these are rich people.” Does this sound like they are rich? Remember, they put all of their money into the two boats that took them 1000 miles beyond their destination, through storms that sank 5 other boats, to crash on a coral reef and destroy the only material possessions they had left….except for the ones that were than looted by the locals.
It was the beginning of January when they arrived back home in California. The stress of this entire situation took a big toll on their relationship and they split up for a time. By the way, the term “home” is misleading. Remember, they had been living on the boat that they started their trip with, so now they actually had no “home” to return to. Darla stayed with our brother, Tom, and I believe Jerry stayed with friends.
It has been written that Darla and Jerry chose to leave their animals on Fanning Island knowing that they would be destroyed; that they made no effort to save their animals from destruction; and that they were unresponsive to emails as to whether or not they were coming back to claim their animals. These accusations are simply not true.
Darla gave me access to her emails in which there are conversations between Darla and the Coleman’s, Darla and LaDonna Buback (latitude38) and one that Jerry wrote to LaDonna. On 1/7/08, LaDonna emailed me to get in touch with Darla to share her story. On that same day, Darla replied that she would love to tell her story. La Donna’s reply on 1/15/08 was as follows:
Instead of writing a typical story about your ‘adventure’ to Fanning, we were thinking of simply runningseveral of the many and strange letters we’ve received.”
So she basically wanted to print the gossip as opposed to what really happened. In the meantime, on 1/11/08 Robby informed Darla that Benaia, the immigration/policeman and Temia, the lady they stayed with would like to know when they were coming back to get their animals. This was only a few weeks after Darla and Jerry retuned to California penniless, homeless, and jobless. On Jerry’s end of things, he sent an email to LaDonna, telling the story of the shipwreck:
We want to get Gulliver and snickers. We had to leave them on fanning island. We miss them, these guys are are kids. When Gulliver talks he calls me daddy and Darla mommy, We are heart broken; we have nothing and no money so if someone out there has a boat they don’t use or want please get hold of us at (phone # and email). We don’t have any money but i can fix just about anything and would gladly trade anything i can do to go get our kids back. Please help if you can.”
Does this sound like someone who chose to “abandon” his pets?
Jan 24 Robby emailed Darla informing her that Gulliver was going to be euthanized at the end of the month. This was the first time that Darla had any idea that her animals were in any kind of danger. Emails prior to this asked when they were coming back but did not mention the animals were in peril. Also, notice that Robby’s email does not mention Snickers, only Gulliver. So Darla still had no knowledge that Snickers life was at risk. February 1, an email came from Robby saying that Snickers got a reprieve and he asked again when they were coming back. It was awhile before Darla could get to a computer to see either of these emails. Remember, she did not have her own computer at this time. She was staying with our brother and looking for work. It was not like she could check heremail everyday. On February 8, Darla emailed “Robbie’:
I have not been able to get on line. Yes I am coming back in about 2 months I should be there. I would be so happy if you could keep Gulliver for me till I get there. You and your wife seem like such nice people.
Thank you
DarlaPS let me know
Robby’s reply came on Feb 15 and was titled, “How do I get you to respond?” She had already told him they would be back in two months, (which would have been in April). So you can see that when people write that Darla and Jerry were unresponsive, it is just not true. Maybe they did not respond as quickly as officials would have liked, but between working on their relationship, restarting a business that kept them working 12-14 hour days, and raising the $50,000 that it took to purchase another boat and working as fast as they possibly could to get ready to go back to the island to save their animals, AND doing all of this in 3 months is pretty admirable in my book!! I truly do not wish to sound ungrateful, but at the same time I can’t help but ask, “How much money did Jack Joslin spend to adopt Snickers?”
In response to Jack printing that Darla requested to not be informed if Snickers was put to death, I would like to say that the reason behind that request was not that we didn’t care to be bothered as Jack says. I will give him the benefit of the doubt for that because he did not realize that within one year Darla (and me) have lost a brother, a mother, a father, an uncle and a cousin to death. The reason Darla didn’t want to know if Snickers was going to be killed was because she didn’t want to have her heart ripped to pieces, yet again, with news of another family member’s death.
One blogger wrote that Darla went on the Montell Williams Show and did not bother to mention that their pets needed rescuing. Although it is true that the animals were not mentioned in this way on the show, it is also true that the air date for the show is July 21, so the person who wrote that comment has absolutely no idea what Darla and I talked about on Montell. When the show taped on March 12, we knew that the air date was not until the middle of summer, so when people saw the show, it would have been to late for them to reach out and help save the animals.
When I spoke to my sister on the phone and let her know of all of the negative comments people were making about them, Darla was so frustrated that she was close to tears. She said again how extremely difficult it was to leave “my children” on Fanning Island. She said that she is furious that she has to explain the actions that they were forced to take throughout this ordeal. They would love to have their pets back and are in fact at this very moment on their way to Christmas Island. She challenges anybody to go through the deadly storms that destroyed not one, but two boats and leave them shipwrecked, come home with not a penny to their name, start their own business, raise $50,000.00, and in 3 months have the fortitude to voyage out again. Any takers?
Kim Corcoran





Because Kim Corcoran has mentioned me specifically in her otherwise interesting report, I will quote the relevant material, and respond directly.
Kim wrote: “I truly do not wish to sound ungrateful, but at the same time I can’t help but ask, ‘How much money did Jack Joslin spend to adopt Snickers?’ ”
Until I read Kim’s rhetorical question as to the amount I’ve spent in the rescue of Snickers, I hadn’t actually accumulated those figures nor given it any thought. Now I have, and here they are:
- To AT&T for numerous long distance, daytime, cell phone calls: approx. $250
- To Norwegian Cruise Lines for passage to Honolulu from Fanning Island: $0
- To the State of Hawaii, Animal Quarantine Station: $123.90
- To Hawaiian Humane Society for their heroic effort on the animals’ behalf, carriers, external parasite powder and spray, leash, collar, flea collar, food, etc.: $500 donation
- To Hawaiian Airlines for shipment from Honolulu to LAX: $0
- To a kind volunteer who met Snickers’ flight at LAX late on a Saturday night, then drove him to Las Vegas the next day: $350
- For that same volunteer, one night’s lodging and internet access at Suncoast Casino Hotel: $80.66
- To Snickers’ new veterinarian, who had Snickers in her office for an entire day to conduct a thorough physical examination, blood test, lab work and sedation to give him an all-over short haircut (to remove the horrible, tangled snarls from his legs that he would not let anyone touch) and bath: $730
I haven’t added all of that up, nor do I really care what it comes to, but anyone is free to do the math.
I only know that a sweet, innocent Cocker Spaniel puppy, who was terribly malnourished; whose coat was a painful, tangled mess; who was infested with fleas; who had reverted to a semi-feral state and was far too aggressive when the first attempts were made to catch him for the initial leg of his trip back to the US; who had been sentenced to death - has once again become a healthy, loving, playful, completely charming bundle of gregarious puppyhood.
So whatever the cost, I’m proud to say this little guy is worth every cent. Or, as a MasterCard commercial might put it: “Rescue of Bundle of Joy: Priceless!”
* * * * *
Insofar as my response to a question at Cruiser’s Forum as to whether I had thought about the possibility of the previous owners trying to get Snickers back, I invite everyone to go to http://www.cruisersforum.com/ and read the entire “Shipwrecked Animals in Peril . . . Please Help!” thread I started there on March 24, 2008.
I never stated that Darla and Kim “didn’t care to be bothered.” In fact I never characterized it at all - I simply included Kim’s email to me and let it speak for itself. Here’s the relevant section (from my post #22) in its entirety for those who don’t want to go to Cruiser’s Forum and read the thread.
* * *
Through the sister of Darla, the woman aboard the doomed vessel, I was told the following on April 2nd:
“I spoke with Darla and this is what she told me about the animals.
She bought both gulliver and snickers from individuals who bred the animals out of their homes in Modesto, California. Gulliver was 2 years old and she has had him for one year. There was no legband because she didn’t buy him from a pet store. Snickers was also bought out of somebody’s home in Modesto, Ca. He was bought as a puppy and is now about 8 months old. All of the paperwork for both animals was on the boat and she can not remember any names or phone numbers of the people who sold her the animals. Snickers had two puppy shots before they left and was not old enough for a rabies shot. They did not fill out any paperwork on the animals before they left on their trip because their intent was not to take them out of the country. They were headed to Hawaii (not out of the country) but got off course when all of the problems with the boat happened. Their destination was not
Fanning Island, that is just where the boat intersected with land; the
final resting place of the boat was not in their control.”
As to release of ownership of the animals, she went on:
“I hope this helps you to be able to get the animals off the island and to safety. Both Darla and I have one request and that is if you fail in your attempt to save the animals, we really do not want to know that. We would like to just think that everything had a positive
outcome.
“Thank you for all that you are doing to help in this situation. It is
greatly appreciated.”
In an email the previous day, she had written:
“Hello, this is Darla’s sister Kim. Darla and Jerry would very much appreciate anything you can do to get the animals back to the united states and into a good home. They do not have internet access right now so if you can email me the release form I can get it to them for their signitures.”
* * *
I sincerely appreciate the fact that Kim has posted her report, above. It adds some detail from someone close to Darla and her husband.
It would be helpful if the Merrows could recall from whom they purchased Gullliver, when they did so, whether they ever had him examined by a veterinarian in the US and, if they did, who that vet was.
Those of us who are trying desperately to rescue Gulliver, an incredibly difficult task given that there is no proof that he was hatched in the US, are grasping at any straw in our attempt to save him. Proof of his US origin is crucial.
Make no mistake - Gulliver is in extreme peril! Unless a miracle happens, and soon, he will be killed by the authorities on Kiritimati (Christmas Island). And to call it euthanasia is incorrect: There is not one veterinarian in the entire Republic of Kiribati, so someone will execute Gulliver with his bare hands.
I would think anyone in a position to help prevent that would do so without any hesitation.
Jack Joslin
APOLOGY TO JACK JOSLIN
I wanted to publically apologize for misquoting you. I really thought that I had read that somewhere. I did look for the quote before I posted it but could not find the right web page. I now have found the page I read and see that you didn’t say that, “they didn’t want to be bothered”. The article is at http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat and is titled “Marooned Pup Rescued by Cruis Ship”. The quote was “They haven’t contacted me about the pets,” Joslin said, “All I’ve heard is that if something happens and the pets don’t make it, they don’t want to know. They want to move on believing that everything turned out alright.” What angered me about it was that you said that you were not contacted about the pets when in the same email I had answered all of your questions about the animals with as much detail as I could. Your quote made it seem ti ne like you took it as we didn’t want care what happened, which was not the case at all. I thought it was a callous move on your part to add that quote and make it look like we didn’t care. So again I apologize for misquoting you and if I post my story anywhere else, I will remove that part.
No hard feelings,
Kim Corcoran
Apology accepted, Kim, but no apology is really necessary.
When I read the quote that you took exception to, I had to search back through several outlets to try to reconstruct the context. It appeared in The Honolulu Advertiser, in a story written by Dave Dondoneau about a day after The Pride of Aloha first docked and Snickers was introduced to the world. It ran under the headline, “Marooned pup rescued by cruise ship,” and was later picked up and run by USA Today, which, like the Honolulu Advertiser, is also owned by Gannett.
A couple of Honolulu stations had called by then, but he was the first to conduct an in-depth interview. What doesn’t appear in his story is his question to me that elicited that quote. He had asked me, over and over again, and in various ways, about the original owners and why they had never gone back to Fanning to get their pets.
I kept saying “I don’t know,” but he kept asking for more. At that time, all I had was your emailed response to me, just as it appears in my post above, so I told him, “All I know . . . etc.” because, in fact, that was all I knew at that time.
Now that I know what the last year has been like for you and your sister, I can see how you might attach more meaning to what I said than what the statement actually contains. It is tragic to lose even one loved one; to lose five in such a short span of time must be a very heavy burden, indeed. Please accept my condolences at your loss.
No hard feelings at all, Kim.
Jack Joslin