• Advertise with us
  • Blog with us
  • Current Deals:

    50% Off Gear: REI

    10% off at Moosejaw-Code MOOSE

    Gift Idea: Oregon Knife Shop 

    Gun Laws - Camo Girl - For Women Hunters by Women Hunters
    CHRISTMAS SPECIAL >> 468x60 Banner on ALL Skinny Moose Hunting Blogs Through the Holidays. ONLY $40... CLICK HERE

    Archive for the 'Gun Laws' Category


    POACHERS IN KS BEWARE!!!

    COURTESY OF KDWP

    Trespassers bag nothing but stiff fines, damaged landowner-hunter relations
    – Firearm deer season is in full swing, and all hunters are reminded that it is illegal to hunt on private land without the owner’s permission, posted or not. Whether a “hunter” actually enters private land without permission or shoots onto it from the road or another landowner’s property without permission, it is illegal.

    Firearms deer season can present the temptation to break the law, especially when a deer is spotted while driving country roads. But the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks (KDWP) reminds hunters that hunting from public roads and railroads requires permission of landowners on both sides of the road or railway. Railroad rights-of-way also require permission from the railroad. In addition, written permission is required to enter land posted with hunting and/or trapping “by Written Permission Only” signs or having trees or fence posts painted purple. In any situation, shooting from a vehicle is illegal unless legally hunting with a disability permit. Shooting from a road can also be extremely dangerous, threatening landowners, other hunters, livestock, and equipment.

    “The state of Kansas convicted 153 poachers for trespassing in 2007,” says Mark Rankin, KDWP Law Enforcement Division assistant director. “This problem drives a wedge between all hunters and landowners, often making it difficult for hunters who once easily obtained permission and have not broken the law.”

    Sometimes, trespassing is accidental, but in many cases it is intentional. Because trespassing harms landowner-hunter relations — and because the penalties for trespassing can be severe — hunters should be aware of the following trespass issues:

    • landowner permission should be obtained before pursuing wounded game onto private property. If the landowner cannot be found, contact a local natural resource officer or sheriff’s office;
    • hunting from roads or railways without legal permission is a form of trespassing called criminal hunting;
    • conviction of trespass or criminal hunting may prevent the convicted person from enjoying hunting privileges in other states. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks is a member of the Wildlife Violator Compact, to which 30 other states currently belong. Under this compact, anyone who has had hunting, fishing, or furharvesting privileges revoked or suspended in a member state cannot hunt, trap, or fish in other member states;
    • conviction of simple criminal hunting can result in a maximum fine of $500, plus court costs, and one month in jail on the first conviction. Additionally, the court can suspend or revoke license privileges for up to a year. A second conviction requires at least one-year suspension of privileges in addition to any fines or jail time;
    • if big game or turkey hunting is involved, the penalties get stiffer. Upon first conviction, the law states that the violator “shall not be fined less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or be imprisoned in the county jail for not more than six months, or both.” The law requires fifth and subsequent conviction penalties of a minimum $1,000 fine and minimum 90 days in jail;
    • criminal trespassing is when the violator does not leave property when told;
    • it is illegal to hunt on land requiring written permission without having written permission on one’s person;
    • upon first conviction for any of these violations, the law allows the revocation of license privileges for a minimum of six months, to which can be added a fine of up to $1,000 plus court costs and up to six months in jail, or both;
    • in any of these cases, hunting privileges may also be revoked; and
    • by law, all hunters must have permission whether the land is posted or not.

    Hunters can address this problem by always asking for permission courteously and accepting denial in the same manner. Hunters can also help by reporting trespassers. Take down the license tag number and all other details of the violation before phoning a local natural resource officer, sheriff’s office, or KDWP’s Operation Game Thief toll-free hotline, 1-877-426-3843. A list of phone numbers for all county natural resource officers can be found in the 2008 Kansas Hunting & Furharvesting Regulations Summary available wherever licenses are sold, or online at www.kdwp.state.ks.us.
    -30-

    Posted on 3rd December 2008
    Under: Firearms, Gun Laws, Hunting, KDWP | 3 Comments »

    Major ATF Ruling Authorizing Electronic A&D Books

    Courtesy of NSSF

    Following discussion with the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) — the trade association for the firearms industry — and many industry members, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced yesterday a major new ruling authorizing federal firearms licensees to use electronic (computerized) acquisition and disposition records provided the software used satisfies certain ATF requirements set forth in the ruling signed by Acting Director Michael Sullivan.

    FFLs will no longer need to seek a variance from the Director of Industry Operations to keep a computerized A&D book.

    “NSSF would like to congratulate ATF, and in particular the leadership of Acting Director Sullivan, on helping to reduce the paperwork burden on industry,” said NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane. “We look forward to continuing to work with ATF on other ways to utilize technology to aid America’s firearms manufacturers and retailers to reduce their paperwork burden while continuing to permit ATF to protect public safety.”

    The ATF, at the urging of NSSF and firearms retailers, is expected to launch a voluntary E– Form 4473. This is a development which will save retailers time and greatly reduce the likelihood of entry violations

    Posted on 9th September 2008
    Under: Firearms, Gun Laws, Gun Policies, Hunting, NSSF | 6 Comments »

    Obama’s Views on Guns

    Here is a tadbit of information that was given to me by my good friend from WILD OKLAHOMA………………..

    .Provide some common-sense enforcement on gun licensing
    Q: When you were in the state senate, you talked about licensing and registering gun owners. Would you do that as president?
    A: I don’t think that we can get that done. But what we can do is to provide just some common-sense enforcement. The efforts by law enforcement to obtain the information required to trace back guns that have been used in crimes to unscrupulous gun dealers. As president, I intend to make it happen. We essentially have two realities, when it comes to guns, in this country. You’ve got the tradition of lawful gun ownership. It is very important for many Americans to be able to hunt, fish, take their kids out, teach them how to shoot. Then you’ve got the reality of 34 Chicago public school students who get shot down on the streets of Chicago. We can reconcile those two realities by making sure the Second Amendment is respected and that people are able to lawfully own guns, but that we also start cracking down on the kinds of abuses of firearms that we see on the streets.
    Source: 2008 Democratic debate in Las Vegas Jan 15, 2008

    2000: cosponsored bill to limit purchases to 1 gun per month
    Obama sought moderate gun control measures, such as a 2000 bill he cosponsored to limit handgun purchases to one per month (it did not pass). He voted against letting people violate local weapons bans in cases of self-defense, but also voted in2004 to let retired police officers carry concealed handguns.
    Source: The Improbable Quest, by John K. Wilson, p.148 Oct 30, 2007

    Stop unscrupulous gun dealers dumping guns in cities
    Q: How would you address gun violence that continues to be the #1 cause of death among African-American men?

    A: You know, when the massacre happened at Virginia Tech, I think all of us were grief stricken and shocked by the carnage. But in this year alone, in Chicago, we’ve had 34 Chicago public school students gunned down and killed. And for the most part, there has been silence. We know what to do. We’ve got to enforce the gun laws that are on the books. We’ve got to make sure that unscrupulous gun dealers aren’t loading up vans and dumping guns in our communities, because we know they’re not made in our communities. There aren’t any gun manufacturers here, right here in the middle of Detroit. But what we also have to do is to make sure that we change our politics so that we care just as much about those 30-some children in Chicago who’ve been shot as we do the children in Virginia Tech. That’s a mindset that we have to have in the White House and we don’t have it right now.
    Source: 2007 NAACP Presidential Primary Forum Jul 12, 2007

    Keep guns out of inner cities–but also problem of morality
    I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manfuacturer’s lobby. But I also believe that when a gangbanger shoots indiscriminately into a crowd because he feels someone disrespected him, we have a problem of morality. Not only do ew need to punish thatman for his crime, but we need to acknowledge that there’s a hole in his heart, one that government programs alone may not be able to repair.
    Source: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama, p.215 Oct 1, 2006

    Ban semi-automatics, and more possession restrictions

    * Principles that Obama supports on gun issues:Ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.
    * Increase state restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms.
    * Require manufacturers to provide child-safety locks with firearms.

    Source: 1998 IL State Legislative National Political Awareness Test Jul 2, 1998

    Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers.
    A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. Voting YES would:

    * Exempt lawsuits brought against individuals who knowingly transfer a firearm that will be used to commit a violent or drug-trafficking crime
    * Exempt lawsuits against actions that result in death, physical injury or property damage due solely to a product defect
    * Call for the dismissal of all qualified civil liability actions pending on the date of enactment by the court in which the action was brought
    * Prohibit the manufacture, import, sale or delivery of armor piercing ammunition, and sets a minimum prison term of 15 years for violations
    * Require all licensed importers, manufacturers and dealers who engage in the transfer of handguns to provide secure gun storage or safety devices

    Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S 397 ; vote number 2005-219 on Jul 29, 2005

    Posted on 29th February 2008
    Under: Gun Laws, Obama, Presidential Debate | 5 Comments »