• Advertise with us
  • Blog with us
  •  

    Gear Reviews - Mostly Archery with dustyvarmint - Skinny Moose Media

    Archive for the 'Gear Reviews' Category

    A dv Gear Review – Stealth Cam 12 Volt Battery Kit

    See A Note On dv’s Gear Reviews and Gear Provider Recommendations.

    Product:  Stealth Cam 12 volt Battery Kit 

    The Stealth Cam 12 Volt Battery Kit, on the left.

    Overall Rating:  ***+ (3.5 stars of 5) 

    Specifications (from Stealth Cam website): 

    -STC-12VBB

    -12 volt

    -Weather proof box  

    -AC charger

    Cost:  **** (4 stars of 5).  Typically $29.95, Wal-Mart (www.walmart.com), to $59.99 at big box outdoor retailers.    

    Performance:  *** (3 stars of 5).  To be fair I have to say that I modified the Stealth Cam Battery Kit’s plug to fit my battery hog Moultrie D40 game camera.  During the non-hunting months I only check my cameras once very 30 days and during season I only check them every 2 weeks so I need the batteries to last.  The battery kit does help to extend the D40’s internal battery life.    However, given daily temperatures in the 30’s or less I can still only get 10 days of battery life between the internal and external batteries even when the battery kit is fitted with a solar panel.   

    Chatter on forum sites indicates there may be a problem where the kit case fills with water.  Mine doesn’t leak, but I set one up for a buddy’s Moultrie D40 and his case does fill with water.  I couldn’t diagnose the problem so he drilled some holes in the bottom to fix it.  I’ve seen where Stealth will fix the problem under warranty, but it wasn’t worth the trouble of returning it for us.  

    Manufacturer’s Customer Service:  Not used, not rated.    

    Source:  Wal-Mart

    General notes:  None.

    happy hunting, dv

    If you liked this blog you may like the following: 

    Feedback, Questions & Comments

    I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

    Subscribe 

    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

    Posted on 11th November 2009
    Under: Gear Reviews | 4 Comments »

    dv Tests Thermos Bottles

    It was April fifth and my feet were frozen.  Mother Nature had smiled upon us during the last 4 days, but today she hit us with a sudden cold snap.  We were hunting turkeys during Kansas’ archery only season, No Bird Left Behind – A Turkey Tale.  In the darkness of the Double-Bull blind my buddy pulled out a Greenhead vacuum bottle and poured us both a cup of hot steaming coffee.  Aaahhh, as I tried to wrap all ten fingers around the little cup I contemplated that life truly was never so good.  Then it was back to watching for turkeys. 

    After that hunt I decided that although I had a full-sized vacuum bottle at home, I needed a small 16-18 ounce bottle for the deer and turkey woods.  And, if my fortunes were down, to use at work also.  But which one?  Dad told me I could get one for $6 and my buddy said he paid more than $20.  I searched the reviews on big box outdoor store websites, but they varied so much they really weren’t much help.  One guy gave the cheap vacuum bottle a 5 star rating and the next rated it 1 star.  Who knew the truth?

    So, despite Mrs. dustyvarmint’s sarcastic reminders of six months shopping for a $28 factory second sleeping bag and eighteen months comparison shopping for a $17.00 cooler, I decided a vacuum bottle test was in order.  Hopefully, this information will save you a little money and derision from your Mr. or Mrs. Hunter.

    First, I had to collect the bottles.  These were the choices, all 16-18 ounces, left to right in the picture below:  Cabela’s Nissan-Thermos, $24.99; Greenhead Bullet Bottle from Cabela’s, $19.99; Cabela’s label, $12.99; Thermos from Gander Mountain (also available from Wal-Mart), $14.99; Quest from Dick’s, $5.99.

    The thermos line up. 

      

    Next, I had to decide how to test them.  So, I started brain storming ways to shoot them into plywood (sorry, a reference to some lame broadhead testing I once read about).  I decided I’d fill them with hot water of a specific temperature, let them sit for a specific period of time and then check the liquid’s temperature.  The three tests included inside for at least eight hours, outside for at least eight hours and in the refrigerator for the same amount of time.  After completing test one I decided to include my full-size Thermos brand bottle and a normal water pitcher for comparison purposes.

    Testing and comparison items.

    Test 1 – Inside ambient air temperature

    The following table shows the results of placing the bottles on the counter over night from 8:05 p.m., temperature 69.0º, to 8:05 a.m., temperature 69.0º; a total of 12 hours.  All bottles were pre-warmed, as is my normal habit, for 10 minutes with 105.7º tap water then filled with 181.6º water from my coffee pot.  Thermos-Nissan was the clear winner followed closely by the regular Thermos and the Greenhead Bullet.  Last place goes to the Quest with the Cabela’s only slightly edging it out.

    • Thermos – Nissan – 145.3
    • Thermos                  – 141.5
    • Greenhead Bullet – 137.3
    • Cabela’s                    – 123.5
    • Quest                         – 115.8
    • Themos                    – not included
    • Uninsulated water pitcher – not included

    Test 2 – Outside air temperature

    The next table shows the results of placing the bottles outside over night from 9:10 p.m., temperature 80.1º, to 7:52 a.m., temperature 74.9º; a total of 10 hours and 42 minutes.  Again, all bottles were pre-warmed for 10 minutes with 120º tap water then filled with 175.6º water from my coffee pot.  Thermos-Nissan is the clear winner followed closely by the regular Thermos and the Greenhead Bullet.  Last place goes to the Quest with the Cabela’s only slightly edging it out.

    • Thermos – Nissan – 140.8
    • Greenhead Bullet – 134.9
    • Thermos                  – 134.5
    • Cabela’s                    – 116.6
    • Quest                         – 109.0
    • Thermos (big)        – 126.0
    • Uninsulated water pitcher – 43.6 

    Test 3 – In the refridgerator

    Finally, this last table shows the results of placing the bottles in a 39.6º refrigerator from 11:35 a.m. to 8:13 p.m.; a total of 7 hours and 38 minutes.  All bottles were pre-warmed for 10 minutes with 120º tap water then filled with 177.5º water.  The Thermos-Nissan is the clear winner followed closely by the Greenhead Bullet and the regular Thermos.  Last place goes to the Quest with the Cabela’s again only slightly edging it out.

    • Thermos – Nissan – 145.6
    • Greenhead Bullet – 138.1
    • Thermos                  – 139.3
    • Cabela’s                    – 122.5
    • Quest                         – 120.1
    • Thermos (big)        – 135.4
    • Uninsulated water pitcher – 79.9  

    Notes

    There is one primary difference between the top three and the bottom two bottles.  The top three all have a one piece stopper with quick-pour feature – you pour the coffee by unscrewing the stopper just a few turns without removing it.  The bottom bottles have a push-button pour-through feature.  It seems as if this design does not retain heat as well. 

    Performance Ranking

    So, overall ranking based on performance is the Thermos-Nissan, Thermos, Greenhead Bullet, Cabela’s and Quest.  I chose to keep the Thermos-Nissan and return the others.  However, if I were to buy a bottle today knowing what I know now I would choose the regular Thermos bottle available at Gander Mountain or Wal-Mart.  It is definitely the overall best value.  If I absolutely had to have camouflage I’d go with the Greenhead Bullet.

    Lexus declares the winners.

    happy hunting, dv

    If you liked this blog you may like the following: 

    Feedback, Questions & Comments

    I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

    Subscribe 

    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

    Posted on 10th November 2009
    Under: Gear Reviews | No Comments »

    Energizer Trailfinder 3 LED Headlight – A dv Gear Review

    Please see the general note about dv’s Gear Reviews

    Product:  Energizer Trailfinder 3 LED Headlamp 

    The Engergizer Trailfinder 3 LED Headlamp

    Overall Rating****+ (4.5 stars of 5) 

    Specifications

    • Two lighting modes
    • Two white LED’s for spot light
    • One red LED for night vision
    • Runs up to 50 hours on 1 set of Energizer MAX batteries
    • Requires 3 AAA batteries (included)
    • Model# HD33A2ODE     

    Cost***** (5 stars of 5).  $12.77.  I like that price.     

    Performance**** (4 stars of 5).  Battery life is good; I changed them out at the beginning of the new season just as a precautionary measure.  Easy to operate.  The head handily tilts.  Reliable.  The on/off button is activated by sliding left to right and is somewhat loose on all that I’ve seen.  It’ll easily come on when stored or carried in a pocket or pack. 

    Manufacturer’s Customer Service:  Not rated.  Not used. 

    SourceWal-Mart

    General notes:  Outdoors buddy Seth turned me on to the conveniences of a headlamp, this one in particular, on a 2008 turkey hunting trip to South Dakota.  Freeing up one hand for carrying a gun or bow and a blind or whatever sure is handy.  I’d previously bought a Primos bowsling thinking that was the answer to my full hands, but it turns out it wasn’t the bow it was the flashlight.  I’ve used this headlamp for one full season including deer hunting, turkey hunting, bowfishing and pronghorn hunting; handy for all.  Dogsledding team mate Victoria used one on our OIF/OEF Veteran’s Dogsled With Outward Bound trip.  It was just as reliable as the double and triple priced Petzls some of the other participants, including myself, used.

    happy hunting, dv 

    If you liked this blog you may like the following:

    Feedback, Questions & Comments

    I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

    Subscribe

    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

    Posted on 14th October 2009
    Under: Gear Reviews | 1 Comment »

    A dv Gear Review – Scout Guard 550 Game Camera

    See A Note On dv’s Gear Reviews and Gear Provider Recommendations.

     

    Product:  The Scout Guard 550 Game Camera

     

     

    Overall Rating:  ****+ (4.5 stars)

     

    Specifications:

     

    - Extra small size 5 1/4″ H x 3 1/4″ W x 2 1/8″ D
    - Motion Sensor with adjustable sensitivity
    - 1.2 second trigger speed
    - 3MP or 5MP picture size
    - Up to 2GB SD card
    - 1 second – 60 minutes programmable delay
    - 1 – 60 second programmable video length
    - Stand-by mode to preserve battery life
    - 8 AA batteries – extra long battery life
    - Wired remote control for easy programming and compact size
    - Operates from -20c to 60c
    - Available in camouflage for added concealment
    - 1 year limited warranty   

     

    Cost:  ***** (4 stars).  $199.95 including free shipping.  Compare its features and performance to comparable models and this is an excellent value.  I just hate spending this much for a camera. 

     

    Performance:  ****** (5 stars).  I don’t ask a lot from my game cameras.  Take pictures or videos reliably and I’m set.  Trigger time is nice compared to my 3 second Moultrie D40.   

     

    Battery life:  Outstanding.  Utilizing the camera on still picture mode with a single picture and one minute delay I put in a set of batteries on September 15th, 2008.  The batteries were still showing two-thirds battery life on January 3rd, 2009 after taking hundreds of photos. 

     

    Picture quality:  Day time pictures and video are clear and some are so nice I want to frame them.  Night time infrared pictures and videos are a little grainy, but discernible.

     

    Set up:  Set up is easy even without reading the manual.

     

    Security:  Camera includes an integral groove for use with a cinch-able lock like the Master Lock Python series.  However, this is easily overcome by sliding the camera up the tree to a smaller diameter.  I recommend the use of a security box which I’ll feature in a future DIY blog.

     

    Manufacturer’s Customer Service:  Not rated, not used.

     

    Source:  Bee Busy Outdoors.  Ordering and shipping went smoothly.

     

    General notes:  This is a great little game camera.  Easily concealable, well functioning.  I have to make one note about viewing pictures from it on common game camera viewers, digital picture frames or point-and-shoot cameras.  There are two common File Allocation Table (FAT) formats for removable media like SD cards, FAT 12 and FAT 16.  The SGs are FAT 16 which is the opposite of most devices.  This creates problems when trying to find a suitable field reader.  Your desktop or laptop PC will have no problems.  Just be aware of this going into a purchase.      

     

    happy hunting, dv

     

    If you liked this blog you may like the following:

    Feedback, Questions & Comments 

  • I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

     

    Subscribe
    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

  • Posted on 25th August 2009
    Under: Game Cameras, Gear Reviews | No Comments »

    A dv Gear Review – Moultrie D40 Game Camera

    See the general note about dv’s Gear Reviews.

     

    Product:  The Moultrie D40 Game Camera

     

    Overall Rating:  ***+ (3.3 stars)

     

    Specifications (from Moultrie’s website):  

    • 4.0 Mega pixels
    • Rapid response time captures moving game
    • 60-day battery life
    • 45-ft white flash ensures optimal viewable shots
    • Color day and night pictures
    • Video clips during the day
    • Imprinted time, date and camera ID on every photo or video
    • Laser and IR aim for quick and precise camera set-up
    • Multi-shot pictures (up to 3 shots)
    • Weather-resistant, airtight camera housing and seal
    • Operates on 6 D-cell batteries (sold separately)
    • Easy to operate LCD menu driven display

    Cost:  **** (4 stars).  Typically $99.95 or less on sale.  I like that price.    

     

    Performance:  *** (3 stars).  I don’t ask a lot from my game cameras.  Take pictures or videos reliably and I’m set.  Trigger time is 3 seconds from wake up (see Chasingame.com’s review).  This makes it a better food plot or feed station camera than a trail camera.        

     

    Battery life:  Here’s the weak link in this camera.  My cameras are deployed 3.5 hours away.  In the summer I visit as seldom as every 30-45 days and in the winter my visits range from 14-21 days apart.  If the camera quits working then it isn’t much good to me.  Summer performance, especially when coupled with a solar panel and auxiliary 12 volt battery (this’ll be the subject of another blog), is 30-60 days.  In the cold temperatures of winter I’ll sometimes only get 10 days of service from good quality batteries.  At one dollar per battery for a total of $6 per crack (refer to Consumer Report’s battery testing) the cost of batteries per season starts to make this camera less attractive when compared to my Scout Guard 550 (review to follow in the future).    

     

    Picture quality:  Good and good enough for scouting game.  See the two top photos in Best Of Trail Camera Photos – May/June 2009 for samples.

     

    Set up:  Set up is easy/intuitive even without reading the manual.

     

    Security:  The D40 is not easily secured as provided.  I recommend the use of a security box which I’ll feature in a future DIY blog.

     

    Manufacturer’s Customer Service:  *** (3 stars).  I’m in the middle, on the fence on this one.  When I called to have a camera repaired they were initially stand-offish since I didn’t enter a purchase date in the warranty registration form on the website.  There were two problems with that.  First, the camera was a gift from my brother.  Second, there is no option or spare space to enter the purchase date on the online form.  I now mail in the card supplied with the camera.  However, when I sent in my D40 Moultrie with a written explanation Moultrie repaired my camera in a timely manner without additional charge.   

     

    Source:  Gift from brother (I blame him for my current infatuation with game cameras).

     

    General notes:  For feeding stations or food plots this is a great little game camera.  They are popular and rated well among consumers.  The price is reasonable.  It’s easy to use.  The pictures are great.  I would like to see better battery life. 

     

    happy hunting, dv

     

    If you liked this blog you may like the following:

    Feedback, Questions & Comments 

  • I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

     

    Subscribe
    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

  • Posted on 27th July 2009
    Under: Game Cameras, Gear, Gear Reviews | No Comments »

    JD Welding Arrow Spin Tester – A dv Gear Review

    See the general note about dv’s Gear Reviews.

     

    Product:  JD Welding Arrow Spin Tester

     

    Manufacturer:  JD Welding

     

    The JD Welding Arrow Spin Tester 

     

     

    Overall Rating:  ***** (5.0 stars)

     

    Specifications:

     

    - Four 7/8″ bearings

    - Heavy duty aluminum

    - 4″ wide x 12″ long x 1 1/2″ high

     

    Cost:  ***** (5 stars).  $25.00 including free shipping.  Compare this spin tester’s price to commercially available, mass-produced models and I don’t think it can be beat. 

     

    Performance:  ****** (5 stars).  Heavy duty with a wide base the spin tester sits on my archery bench well and performs well.  It certainly pointed out the flaw in that rotten #1 arrow that always hits three inches high. 

     

    Manufacturer’s Customer Service:  Not rated, not used.

     

    General notes:  Using a spin tester to check your arrows’ straightness and broadhead alignment is crucial.  Broadheads not properly aligned with the arrow’s axis will lead to unwanted flyers.  Usually I want to use something an entire season before doing a gear review especially if it is a positive review, but for some products I don’t think that is necessary.  This spin tester is one of them.  I don’t know what else you could ask for.  Great price, great product, good service.  ‘Nuff said.  Contact Joe to get yours.

     

    happy hunting, dv

     

    If you liked this blog you may like the following:

    Feedback, Questions & Comments

    I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

     

    Subscribe
    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

     

     

     

     

    Posted on 30th June 2009
    Under: Gear Reviews | No Comments »

    The Magnet Gun Caddy – A dv Gear Review

     

    Preventing Disaster

    Thanks to Skinny Moose Media I had the opportunity to review the Magnet Gun Caddy.  The Caddy is a small plastic and foam device with a magnet on the back.  It is made to hold a gun upright against your car or truck before or after your field outing. 

     

    The picture on their website showing a shotgun leaning unassisted against a truck brings back memories of youthful pheasant and quail hunting in my native Kansas.  A damaged sight bead, a scratched gun, a scratched vehicle, a disaster waiting to happen.        

     

    I didn’t think they would have released the product to the public or asked us to review it if it wouldn’t hold up a measly shotgun or rifle so I decided to give it an opportunity to hold up some real iron.  After reading the instructions on the package and on the handout provided to reviewers I grabbed my .50 caliber, heavy octagon-barreled traditional black powder rifle and headed for the truck.  My Toyota Tacoma Pre-Runner sits up high enough and has contours in all the wrong places that it took me a couple of minutes to find the sweet spot.  After that the Magnet Gun Caddy worked like a charm on both hard surface asphalt and on grass.

     

    However, this is dv’s Mostly Archery so you know I couldn’t stop there.  The same problem that the Magnet Gun Caddy addresses for gun hunters also plagues bowhunters.  It is far too easy to step on a grounded bowstring, sight or bow-mounted quiver of arrows in early morning darkness.  I grabbed my Reflex Highlander and experimented with fitting the top limb into the Gun Caddy.  It worked, but required a lot more experimentation and I wasn’t happy with the results.  That’s no fault of the Gun Caddy, though.  It isn’t what it was designed for.

     

    Summary

    Function:  ***** (4 stars)  The Magnet Gun Caddy worked for its intended purpose and is a good idea to prevent damage to guns and vehicles.  The instructions on the hand-out provided supplemental information and would be nice to have when purchasing the product.   

     

    Value:  ***** (2 stars)  I think the street price of $9-11 is a little high.  I’d probably have to encounter catastrophic damage to one of my seldom used guns before I paid more than $4.50 for one. 

     

    The Magnet Gun Caddy has received the North American Hunting Club Field Tested Seal of Approval.  For more information visit Magnet Gun Caddy.

     

    Note:  For all Gear Reviews please refer to A Note About dv’s Gear Reviews and Gear Provider Recommendations.

     

    happy hunting, dv

     

    Feedback, Questions & Comments

    I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions.  Please leave them below.  

     

    Subscribe
    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

    Coming up on Mostly Archery

    • Bowfishing – Preparing the Boat
    • dv’s 2009 Turkey Season Review

    Posted on 25th May 2009
    Under: Gear Reviews | 1 Comment »

    A Note on dv’s Gear Reviews and Gear Provider Recommendations

    Before I post another dv’s Gear Provider Recommendation or my first Gear Review I wanted to drop a note about them.

     

    First, I am not currently sponsored by any retailer, manufacturer or service provider.  If that ever changes I will update this post and each Review or Recommendation will refer back to it.  The bottom line is that if I don’t think something measures up I will tell you about it.

     

    Second, unless something fails right away it will have been used for some period of time, likely an entire season, before it is reviewed.  One of my pet peeves is the following review, “Just got it in the mail today.  Looks great.  Should work great.  I give it five stars!”  What, are you kidding me?  Reviewing items at the end of a season doesn’t put me on the cutting edge, but that isn’t my purpose.  I want solid-performing gear worth the meager money Mrs. dv allows me to spend.

     

    Gear Providers will likely only be recommended if they have been used at least twice.  Things like returning phone calls and e-mails in a timely manner, standing behind their product and providing great customer service are critical factors.

     

    Third, it is economically unlikely that I can compare multiple models of a particular product.  For instance I can Review a particular rangefinder, but it will be unlikely I can compare that rangefinder to three others by different manufacturers.  However, it may happen on occasion.

     

    happy hunting, dv

     

    Feedback, Questions & Comments
    I’d like to hear your tips, feedback, comments or questions. Please leave them below.

    Subscribe
    Like this blog? Want to be notified of updates? Subscribe via RSS feed by clicking here.

    Coming up on Mostly Archery

    • dv’s Gear Provider Recommendations – ACE, provider of ASAT, Sitka Gear and Wilderness Athlete Products
    • Overhauling A Bow
    • Veteran’s Dogsled in Minnesota’s Boundary Water Canoe Area

     

     

     

    Posted on 24th March 2009
    Under: Gear, Gear Providers, Gear Reviews | 2 Comments »